Re: Why is implicit and explicit 'nil' treated differently?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: Why is implicit and explicit 'nil' treated differently?
• From: Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@...>
• Date: 2015年4月20日 15:46:02 +0200

---

2015年04月20日 15:24 GMT+02:00 Robert Virding <rvirding@gmail.com>:
> Where does 'none' come from? I cannot find any mention of it in the 5.2
> manual.
It seems to be deduced from C API function names like 'lua_isnone'.

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why is implicit and explicit 'nil' treated differently?, Andrew Starks

• References:
  • Varargs efficiency, Soni L.
  • Re: Varargs efficiency, Sean Conner
  • Re: Varargs efficiency, Soni L.
  • Re: Varargs efficiency, Tim Hill
  • Re: Varargs efficiency, Soni L.
  • Re: Varargs efficiency, Hisham
  • Why is implicit and explicit 'nil' treated differently?, tonyp
  • Re: Why is implicit and explicit 'nil' treated differently?, Jan Behrens
  • Re: Why is implicit and explicit 'nil' treated differently?, Andrew Starks
  • Re: Why is implicit and explicit 'nil' treated differently?, Robert Virding

• Prev by Date: Re: Why is implicit and explicit 'nil' treated differently?
• Next by Date: Re: Why is implicit and explicit 'nil' treated differently?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why is implicit and explicit 'nil' treated differently?
• Next by thread: Re: Why is implicit and explicit 'nil' treated differently?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread