Re: [ANN] Lua 5.3.0 (rc3) now available

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: [ANN] Lua 5.3.0 (rc3) now available
• From: Lorenzo Donati <lorenzodonatibz@...>
• Date: 2015年1月05日 13:02:23 +0100

---

On 05/01/2015 12:27, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo wrote:

I don't know the differences between the two compiler modes, but doesn't
this risk of opening the way for non-conformance "bugs" in the future?
Maybe a non-C99 GNU GCC feature could slip in and go undetected, or am I
missing something?

We develop Lua with strict flags and as many warnings as possible turned on.
The flags in the distribution are permissive, on purpose.

Ah! That's interesting. Thanks!

---

• References:
  • [ANN] Lua 5.3.0 (rc3) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.3.0 (rc3) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.3.0 (rc3) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.3.0 (rc3) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.3.0 (rc3) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.3.0 (rc3) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.3.0 (rc3) now available, Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.3.0 (rc3) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo

• Prev by Date: Re: [ANN] Lua 5.3.0 (rc3) now available
• Next by Date: Re: Lua 5.3.0 manual: can we have the operator precedence table reversed?
• Previous by thread: Re: [ANN] Lua 5.3.0 (rc3) now available
• Next by thread: Re: [ANN] Lua 5.3.0 (rc3) now available
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread