Re: Proposal: allow @, ,ドル !, and ? in Lua identifiers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Proposal: allow @, ,ドル !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- From: Coroutines <coroutines@...>
- Date: 2014年4月25日 06:01:00 -0700
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 5:37 AM, steve donovan
<steve.j.donovan@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's a fine convention, but then everyone must use the convention
> consistently and idiomatically. An enormous amount of code must then
> be rewritten.
It could be confusing if only part of the community used these
characters for that convention, agreed :>
> The situation IMHO is better handled with good documentation
> practices.
Hmm, says the ldoc author/maintainer. I agree that documentation is
good, but I hate to expect it. I like function names that document
their use more than documentation that is well written. If I were a
third-party I'd say we both have valid points here.
>
> As for the other characters, well perhaps we'll think of a better use
> for them? My concern is that people will use them willy-nilly,
> because they look Cool....
I could see things like 'local a??????? = 3' being annoying. I think
the benefit over the eyesore would be knowing that an identifier for a
non-function is meant to be a boolean.
- Prev by Date:
Re: Proposal: allow @, ,ドル !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Next by Date:
Re: Proposal: allow @, ,ドル !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Previous by thread:
Re: Proposal: allow @, ,ドル !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Next by thread:
Re: Proposal: allow @, ,ドル !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Index(es):