Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: 2014年4月10日 18:41:33 +0200
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Thiago L. <fakedme@gmail.com> wrote:
> Whatever ({mt.__index(1)})[2] and ({mt.__index(1)})[3] would be...
And that's exactly the point - even experienced users of the language
would not know what to expect, because there _could_ be a magic
metamethod.
-1 for this one, it really causes confusion.
- References:
- __index returns truncated to one, why?, duz
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, Dirk Laurie
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, Andrew Starks
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, steve donovan
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, Dirk Zoller
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, steve donovan
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, Duncan Cross
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, Sean Conner
- Re: __index returns truncated to one, why?, Thiago L.