Re: mathlib
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: mathlib
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 18:57:27 +0200
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Christopher Berardi
<cberardi32@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think you should add all of those. I am indifferent to whether the
> proposed functions should be removed or remain.
Pretty much my feeling.
> I would like to see a comprehensive (3rd party) math library for Lua, one
> that could be used for a wide variety of mathematical disciplines instead.
Well, there's lhf's lmathx, binds the extra C99 functions. Then
things get ... complicated, because people have different mathematical
needs.
> I'll also put myself with those who want a more robust and expressive
> require function.
But precisely what does this mean?
- References:
- Re: mathlib, Ousmane Roland Yonaba
- Re: mathlib, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: mathlib, Ralph Hempel
- Re: mathlib, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: mathlib, Dirk Laurie
- Re: mathlib, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: mathlib, Coroutines
- Re: mathlib, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: mathlib, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: mathlib, Christopher Berardi