On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Milind Gupta <
milind.gupta@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we need to just see if they are equivalent to the functions being
> removed from the library. If the math library functions have such quirks and
> if the replacement replicate them then they should not be missed from the
> library.
> Having such quirks may be a reason to support their removal because
> when you reach such conditions where you have to look at these things you
> may end up using your custom conditioned functions.
>
> Milind
>