Re: BASIC-like Lua variant

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: BASIC-like Lua variant
From: Peter Hickman <peterhickman386@...>
Date: 2014年1月14日 13:53:47 +0000

On 14 January 2014 13:36, <colinz@gmx.com> wrote:

On 2014年01月14日 14:24, Peter Hickman wrote:

Not to be too blunt but why don't you just use Basic itself?

It goes without saying: Lua is soooo much better.

Except for the syntax which it appears is too much for you to grok.

References:
- BASIC-like Lua variant, colinz
- Re: BASIC-like Lua variant, Volodymyr Bezobiuk
- Re: BASIC-like Lua variant, colinz
- Re: BASIC-like Lua variant, steve donovan
- Re: BASIC-like Lua variant, colinz
- Re: BASIC-like Lua variant, Peter Hickman
- Re: BASIC-like Lua variant, colinz

Prev by Date: Re: BASIC-like Lua variant
Next by Date: Re: BASIC-like Lua variant
Previous by thread: Re: BASIC-like Lua variant
Next by thread: Re: BASIC-like Lua variant
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread