Re: Empty? No. Array? No. Has? Yes.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Empty? No. Array? No. Has? Yes.
- From: Coda Highland <chighland@...>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 14:36:04 -0700
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Javier Guerra Giraldez
<javier@guerrag.com> wrote:
> then there's no need to standardize on which
> "empty" is used on every module
No need to do so, but it'd be AWFULLY nice.
> nor any "meta emptiness" escalation,
I keep asking about this -- WHY is there a "meta-emptiness" problem?
No one seems to have an explanation for why there can't just be an
"empty" value, even if it's just a SPECIFIC immutable empty table put
into the global scope by default.
/s/ Adam