Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: 2013年3月11日 09:18:31 +0200
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Zé <jose.passes@gmx.com> wrote:
> Obviously, I wasn't talking about projects which include system headers. I
> was talking about projects whose system headers change so frequently that
> you need your automatic build system to track them for changes as well.
Well, then use -M instead of -MM. Easily done! (Microsoft compiler
has /ShowIncludes that does the same thing)
Gentlemen, I think it's time we moved this elsewhere...
- References:
- Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Spencer Parkin
- Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, steve donovan
- Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Sean Conner
- Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Joshua Jensen
- Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Zé
- Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Joshua Jensen
- Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Zé
- Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, martinwguy
- Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Zé
- Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, William Ahern
- Re: Build systems suck. Can Lua be the basis for a better build system?, Zé