RE: want luaL_verror()
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: RE: want luaL_verror()
- From: Richter, Jörg <Joerg.Richter@...>
- Date: 2012年11月27日 07:52:03 +0000
> > Doesn't this work?
> >
> > LUA_API int luaL_verror (lua_State *L, const char *fmt, va_list argp) {
> > return luaL_error(L, "%s", lua_pushvfstring(L, fmt, va_list));
> > }
>
> I don't know if it matters much. But va_end will not be called.
Thinking more about it: Can such a function ever be implemented "right" (without additional parameters)?
It might depend on the caller if va_end must be called or should not be called.
But I think common practice for functions with va_list parameters is not to call va_end.
Jörg