That *could* end up being the final syntax; I haven't decided yet. Consistency would be nice, but I'll end up mixing if it means the implementation is simpler. On 2012年8月24日 18:46:43 -0500 Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@guerrag.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Rena <hyperhacker@gmail.com> wrote: > > I really like how you can do "require 'foo'" or "require:xyz > > 'foo'". I may have to steal that idea. > > why i don't get is why to use "require:xyz 'foo'" instead of > "require.xyz 'foo'" >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature