Re: Arguments for a module loader
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Arguments for a module loader
- From: Matthias Kluwe <mkluwe@...>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 20:31:07 +0200
Hi!
2012年8月7日 Coda Highland <chighland@gmail.com>:
>> /*-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ; [1] - please, please, please, ifyou are writing in C, use NULL instead
>> ; of a 0. Even though NULL is 0, using NULL portrays the intent
>> ; better than a 0. It also stands out more.
>> ;
>> ; If you are writing in C++, you have my condolences. [2]
>> ;
>> ; [2] - Okay, my bias is showing through. Sorry.
>> ;----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>
> If you are writing in C++, you have nullptr that's even better than NULL. :P
Well, that's C++11, isn't it? If you can use that in your daily work: Lucky you.
Regards,
Matthias