Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?)
- From: Miles Bader <miles@...>
- Date: 2012年4月24日 16:47:02 +0900
Rena <hyperhacker@gmail.com> writes:
> I often felt there'd be a lot less confusion about the table library
> if it were named 'array' instead.
I agree!
[Or, "sequence" or seq" or ...]
Of course, given the flexibility of Lua's module mechanism it's pretty
easy to do this on a local level already ("local array = table"); when
I make local aliases for table functions, I usually do use a term like
"array" ("local array_delete = table.remove").
-miles
--
Pray, v. To ask that the laws of the universe be annulled in behalf of a
single petitioner confessedly unworthy.
- References:
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Joseph Manning
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Coda Highland
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Dirk Laurie
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Coda Highland
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), joao lobato
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Coda Highland
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), joao lobato
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Eduardo Ochs
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Petite Abeille
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Petite Abeille
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Petite Abeille
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Petite Abeille
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Javier Guerra Giraldez
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), steve donovan
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Rena