On 23 Apr, 2012, at 16:26 , Ryan Pusztai wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Peter Drahoš
<drahosp@gmail.com> wrote:
This would be more than welcome. I prefer to build SciTE directly, in fact it is already planed for the 1.0 release[1]. However my experience with lua-gdb and scite-debug is limited.
pd
This is looking GREAT! Can't wait to try it on Linux (as well as Windows).
Is/can 0MQ (libzmq) be added to the batteries list please?
Sure, it has been requested before and it is already in the Repository [1][2], not sure if it currently builds cleanly on all platforms (CI builds are in the making).
Thanks again for all your effort. Once this goes stable. I will gladly volunteer to make Lua For Windows installer use this. In fact, if there are some other ideas for the what a "combined" installer would look like, I would be glad to merge/start a new one.
This would be great. I aimed to use CPack + NSIS to make a Windows installer for batteries-1.0 that could install more modules besides batteries. Additionally you could skip installation of headers, documentation and development libraries that are all now included by default. However a more sophisticated installer would probably be needed for Windows user so it integrates into the UI and sets up file associations.
PS: I also made an experiment to distribute the batteries package on OS X using Application Bundle[3], while it is not the standard approach it works surprisingly well without polluting the host system.