Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?)
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: 2012年4月18日 10:47:36 +0200
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@gmail.com> wrote:
> Heck, people, the Lua team has gone out of their way to
> solve the #t issue by providing the __len metamethod:
A not commonly known fact is that LuaJIT 2.0 supports __len, __ipairs
and __pairs if you recompile with this line in luaconf.h
#define LUAJIT_ENABLE_LUA52COMPAT 1
Maybe malkia can distribute Windows binaries with this set?
steve d.
- References:
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Dirk Laurie
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Robert Virding
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Coda Highland
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Joseph Manning
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Coda Highland
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Dirk Laurie
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Coda Highland
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), joao lobato
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Coda Highland
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), joao lobato
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Eduardo Ochs
- RE: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Alexandre Rion
- Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Dirk Laurie