Re: S.W.O.T analysis
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: S.W.O.T analysis
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: 2012年3月13日 09:43:04 +0200
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll go so far as to say that if a package consisting of more than
> a single Lua file does not install by `luarocks install pkgname`,
> I'm usually too lazy to install it.
Which is why Hisham needs our support, he's running key infrastructure.
I'll make μL available as a rock, as well, so people can use it as a
lightweight dependency. It can be a bit unfamiliar at first, making a
rockspec, so one thing we can do is package existing projects (most
developers are fine with that if asked). One area that needs
attention is GUI kits - I think only ltcltk works out of the box
(although the tcl/tk headers have an annoying habit of moving around).
I'm thinking of things like IUP (LuaGnome is available directly from
the Debian/Ubuntu repos)
steve d.