On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 22:47, Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> https://github.com/LuaDist/luasocket > > LuaDist doesn't contain any changes to luasocket that I saw, so I > wouldn't call it a fork. Logistically it is still a fork. You have to track it if you care for post-2.0.2 luasocket. >> http://code.matthewwild.co.uk/luasocket2-hg/ >> https://bitbucket.org/liamdevine/luasocket_ipv6_lua_51_52 > > The second is an extension of the first, btw. Most inconvenient. Compare with how natural GitHub forks are. Alexander.