alex.mania@iinet.net.au wrote: > is the above undocumented but intended behaviour? (it'd be pretty > nasty to document) http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2011-08/msg00283.html http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2011-08/msg00300.html > or is the ordering implementation-defined, ie would LuaJIT be allowed > to handle it differently? Undefined means undefined. Anything could happen ... > or is the above a bug that will/should be corrected? Nope. --Mike