Re: verification and linting of lua implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: verification and linting of lua implementations
• From: Florian Weimer <fw@...>
• Date: 2011年10月25日 23:01:17 +0200

---

* Thomas Buergel:
> Perhaps it might be worth to register Lua for Coverity Scan[1]?
So that Coverity claims in a press release that Lua contains 88
high-risk defects? I'm not sure if this is such a great idea.

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: verification and linting of lua implementations, Thomas Buergel
  • Re: verification and linting of lua implementations, Iain Hibbert
  • Re: verification and linting of lua implementations, Alessandro Delgado

• References:
  • Re: verification and linting of lua implementations, jos van kesteren
  • Re: verification and linting of lua implementations, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • RE: verification and linting of lua implementations, Thomas Buergel

• Prev by Date: Re: Lua-friendly OSes
• Next by Date: Re: Lua-friendly OSes
• Previous by thread: RE: verification and linting of lua implementations
• Next by thread: RE: verification and linting of lua implementations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread