Re: Why does the default cpath not have lib?.so in it?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Why does the default cpath not have lib?.so in it?
- From: Sebastien Lai <237482@...>
- Date: 2011年9月13日 11:24:50 +0200
> When I compile a library called foo on my Linux box, I get a libfoo.so
file.
Please tell what kind of compiler you use that you get a libfoo.so?
I've never seen something like that before. I suggest you to try to
use a vanilla version of GCC or Clang.