Re: no return value vs. nil return value(s)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: no return value vs. nil return value(s)
• From: Florian Weimer <fw@...>
• Date: 2011年9月11日 19:33:49 +0200

---

* Lorenzo Donati:
> Maybe I'm missing something, but IMHO the manual is not clear about it.
I just can repeat myself: based on my reading, the no-results case is
covered by the manual, in the excerpts as I quoted. It's not a formal
document, but the formulation "no adjustment is made" pretty clearly
indicates that the no-arguments case is intentionally observable.
(It's also visible to the C API, so it's not just select("#"))t.

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: no return value vs. nil return value(s), Lorenzo Donati

• References:
  • no return value vs. nil return value(s), Lorenzo Donati
  • Re: no return value vs. nil return value(s), Florian Weimer
  • Re: no return value vs. nil return value(s), Lorenzo Donati

• Prev by Date: Re: no return value vs. nil return value(s)
• Next by Date: Re: Lua workshop
• Previous by thread: Re: no return value vs. nil return value(s)
• Next by thread: Re: no return value vs. nil return value(s)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread