lua-users home
lua-l archive
Re: Holes
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Subject
:
Re: Holes
From
: Henning Diedrich <hd2010@
...
>
Date
: 2010年12月16日 22:23:24 +0100
On 12/16/10 8:14 PM, Dirk Laurie wrote: [
1. No example based on demonstrating capricious behaviour of the length operator or a function from the table library when applied to an array with holes proves anything more than that an attempt has been made to do something Roberto has specifically warned against. 2. All these brilliant suggestions can be implemented totally within Lua itself without changing the specification of the language.
Yeah but, even if it is demonstrably perfectly defensible and air tight as is,
there are people who feel a different behavior would be fitting Lua's elegance
better, be more intuitive, less error prone, require less deeper level
understanding to program swiftly on the higher level. To me it seems less
personally motivated than you judge it.
Make it "Could Lua benefit from a more useful, or maybe 'safe', behavior of #t for holy ts?"
Henning
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Holes
,
Axel Kittenberger
Re: Holes
,
Roberto Ierusalimschy
Holy arrays vs perfect arrays
,
Dirk Laurie
References
:
Holes
,
Mark Hamburg
Re: Holes
,
Joshua Phillips
Re: Holes
,
Dirk Laurie
Prev by Date:
chained relational operators
Next by Date:
Re: Holes
Previous by thread:
Re: Holes
Next by thread:
Re: Holes
Index(es):
Date
Thread
AltStyle
によって変換されたページ
(->オリジナル)
/
アドレス:
モード:
デフォルト
音声ブラウザ
ルビ付き
配色反転
文字拡大
モバイル