Re: Size and dependencies of bit.dll (LuaForWindows)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Size and dependencies of bit.dll (LuaForWindows)
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: 2010年9月28日 08:59:34 +0200
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Drake Wilson <drake@begriffli.ch> wrote:
> (Yes, this does imply that MinGW linking against MSVCRT by default
> seems broken to me, though not necessarily in an easily rectifiable
> way. I would tend to think that the theoretically-correct approach
> would be along the lines of an extra libre CRT for Windows of some
> kind, but I'm insufficiently experienced with Windows to be sure of
> that.)
It's clearly an idea that's in the air, as a quick Google search
indicates, but it would be a big job. And remember that msvcrt.dll
also provides basic C++ support, which is tangled up with the MS
implementation.
(There would also be a temptation to fix 'broken' things ;))
steve d.
PS. Yes, I hear this, that MS does not recommend msvcrt.dll, but _in
practice_ things seem to work ok across Windows versions. (They do
want you to use their tools, after all)
- References:
- Size and dependencies of bit.dll (LuaForWindows), J.Jørgen von Bargen
- Re: Size and dependencies of bit.dll (LuaForWindows), Rob Kendrick
- Re: Size and dependencies of bit.dll (LuaForWindows), J.Jørgen von Bargen
- Re: Size and dependencies of bit.dll (LuaForWindows), steve donovan
- Re: Size and dependencies of bit.dll (LuaForWindows), Shmuel Zeigerman
- Re: Size and dependencies of bit.dll (LuaForWindows), steve donovan
- Re: Size and dependencies of bit.dll (LuaForWindows), J.Jørgen von Bargen
- Re: Size and dependencies of bit.dll (LuaForWindows), steve donovan
- Re: Size and dependencies of bit.dll (LuaForWindows), E. Toernig
- Re: Size and dependencies of bit.dll (LuaForWindows), Drake Wilson