Re: Ternary operator patch
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Ternary operator patch
- From: David Kastrup <dak@...>
- Date: 2010年9月16日 09:48:13 +0200
Jeff Pohlmeyer <yetanothergeek@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:20 AM, steve donovan wrote:
>
>> Just to be different, how about a pseudo-function
>> choose(cond,val1,val2) with the appropriate lazy evaluation?
>
> pseudo?
>
> function choose(expr,yes,no)
> if expr then return yes else return no end
> end
That evaluation is inappropriately unlazy.
--
David Kastrup
- References:
- Re: Ternary operator patch, steve donovan
- Re: Ternary operator patch, Henk Boom
- Re: Ternary operator patch, steve donovan
- Re: Ternary operator patch, Geoff Leyland
- Re: Ternary operator patch, steve donovan
- Re: Ternary operator patch, Miles Bader
- Re: Ternary operator patch, David Kastrup
- Re: Ternary operator patch, Miles Bader
- Re: Ternary operator patch, David Kastrup
- Re: Ternary operator patch, Jonathan Castello
- Re: Ternary operator patch, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Ternary operator patch, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: Ternary operator patch, steve donovan
- Re: Ternary operator patch, Jeff Pohlmeyer