Re: Lua 5.2 and continue
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua 5.2 and continue
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: 2010年1月14日 11:11:54 +0200
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@gmail.com> wrote:
> bodies are to be refactored. If you can't refactor it to a set of
> functions due to performance considerations, then elegance should not
> be issue.
Sigh, that's life in the embedded world! There's always a cost to
elegance, cf 'abstraction penalty'.
Although, I much prefer code without excessive indentation and
'arrows', especially since the logic here is essentially linear.