Re: Support for Windows unicode paths
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Support for Windows unicode paths
- From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@...>
- Date: 2009年7月23日 13:20:27 +0000
Hallo,
On 7/23/09, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> One doesn't need wide strings to use unicode, utf-8 works fine.
>
> Microsoft made a bad call, and they're stuck with it, but Lua need not
> do so.
>
UTF-8 is best for serialisation (writing text to disk, to socket
etc.). For in-memory strings it makes a lot of algorithms harder.
UCS-2 was a bad idea, but UTF-16 works perfectly well. UTF-32 is even
better.
--
-alex
http://www.ventonegro.org/
- References:
- Support for Windows unicode paths, Thomas Harning Jr.
- Re: Support for Windows unicode paths, Bulat Ziganshin
- Re: Support for Windows unicode paths, David Given
- Re: Support for Windows unicode paths, Thomas Harning Jr.
- Re: Support for Windows unicode paths, Jerome Vuarand
- Re: Support for Windows unicode paths, Joshua Jensen
- Re: Support for Windows unicode paths, Shmuel Zeigerman
- Re: Support for Windows unicode paths, Miles Bader
- Re: Support for Windows unicode paths, Joshua Jensen
- Re: Support for Windows unicode paths, Miles Bader