Re: Request for ./?/init.lua in the default package.path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: Request for ./?/init.lua in the default package.path
• From: David Manura <dm.lua@...>
• Date: 2009年5月28日 19:56:24 -0400

---

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:42 PM, M Joonas Pihlaja wrote:
> Can Lua 5.2 have ./?/init.lua in the default package.path?
Or remove the init.lua thing entirely [1].
[1] http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2009-04/msg00389.html

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Request for ./?/init.lua in the default package.path, M Joonas Pihlaja
  • Re: Request for ./?/init.lua in the default package.path, Duncan Cross
  • Re: Request for ./?/init.lua in the default package.path, Henk Boom

• References:
  • Request for ./?/init.lua in the default package.path, M Joonas Pihlaja

• Prev by Date: Re: Status of lposix?
• Next by Date: Re: Alternatives to reference counting
• Previous by thread: Request for ./?/init.lua in the default package.path
• Next by thread: Re: Request for ./?/init.lua in the default package.path
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread