Re: Lua - C++ Bindings
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua - C++ Bindings
- From: Anders Backman <andersb@...>
- Date: 2009年1月21日 20:42:27 +0100
Yes, sorry vague sentence... I know nested classes works with tolua++, but it was a good thing you mentioned it so I could test it with the other bindings (lqt included).
I like lqt also because it will expand c-macros too, I had some places where tolua++ did not do the trick because some macro magic was used to implement some things....
With lqt that works right out of the box.
/A
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Tim Niemueller
<niemueller@kbsg.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
Anders Backman schrieb:
>
> But your comment about tolua++ and nested classes is valid for lqt too...
I said it works just fine with tolua++, but as you suggest it does not
for lqt...
I give simplified headers to tolua++ (remove everything that is private,
no comments etc.). Since we already auto-generate large parts of the C++
code base, generating an additional simplified header to feed to tolua++
is easy. Virtual method binding is not of a concern for us at the moment.
--
__________________________________________
Anders Backman, CTO Algoryx Simulation AB
Uminova Science Park, Box 7973, SE-907 19
Umeå, Sweden
anders@algoryx.se http://www.algoryx.se
Cell: +46-70-392 64 67