Lunar or better another C++ binding framework?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Lunar or better another C++ binding framework?
- From: Michael Bauroth <Michael.Bauroth@...>
- Date: 2008年11月12日 16:25:02 +0100
Hi,
I've used Lunar for my first steps in Lua because of it's flat learning
curve. But now I'm at a point, where with lots of derived classes it
seems a little bit ugly to register (redundant) again and again all
methods also from derived classes. Example
class A {
public:
void a();
}
class B : public A {
}
and ...
const char A::className[] = "A";
Lunar< A >::RegType A::methods[] = {
method( A, a ),
{ 0, 0 }
};
const char B::className[] = "B";
Lunar< B >::RegType B::methods[] = {
method( B, a ),
{ 0, 0 }
};
...
Is there a possibility to handle these things easier right in Lunar or
do I need another C++ framework to reduce such redundant code? Which
framework would you suggest in this case (should be compilable on ARM
with WinCE)?
Best Regards
Micha