Re: LUA Vs Javascript
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: LUA Vs Javascript
- From: ketmar <ketmar@...>
- Date: 2008年6月28日 03:03:51 +0300
On 2008年6月28日 00:55:48 +0100
Stephen Kellett <lua@objmedia.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> I prefer Lua to JS for most things, but one thing JS (and Ruby and
> Python, etc) does better is that in JS you can ask an object what its
> type is and get a human readable string that makes sense ("String",
> "Weeble", "Mouse", NASDAQPrice", etc).
function MyObj () {
return this;
}
var a = new MyObj();
print(a);
print(typeof(a));
spidermonkey says:
[object Object]
object
can't see any "type name" here. and so does Lua. give your object
"tostring" metatmethod, and it will be fine. no magick here, no magick
there. it's only a coding discipline.