Re: Need standard kernel supported class in Lua, was: Macros andexpressivity
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Need standard kernel supported class in Lua, was: Macros andexpressivity
- From: "Javier Guerra" <javier@...>
- Date: 2008年1月15日 09:01:06 -0500
On 1/15/08, Grellier, Thierry <t-grellier@ti.com> wrote:
> Why standard is synonym to poor performance to you? I mean yes standard
> is priority one for me. But I would find "foolish" that standard is
> implemented the less efficient way. Reasonably fast is hard to determine
if it's standard, i has to be 'all enclosing'. to get that are two
approaches: bloat and better abstractions.
guess what do most Lua'ists prefer?
--
Javier
- References:
- Re: Macros and expressivity, Asko Kauppi
- Re: Macros and expressivity, Mark Hamburg
- RE:Need standard kernel supported class in Lua, was: Macros and expressivity, Grellier, Thierry
- Re: Need standard kernel supported class in Lua, was: Macros and expressivity, Fabien
- Re: Need standard kernel supported class in Lua, was: Macros and expressivity, Ben
- RE: Need standard kernel supported class in Lua, was: Macros and expressivity, Grellier, Thierry
- Re: Need standard kernel supported class in Lua, was: Macros and expressivity, Stefan Sandberg
- RE: Need standard kernel supported class in Lua, was: Macros andexpressivity, Grellier, Thierry