Re: Strange omission in lfs?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Strange omission in lfs?
- From: David Kastrup <dak@...>
- Date: 2007年8月25日 19:04:02 +0200
Jürgen Hötzel <juergen@hoetzel.info> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 06:21:27PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> dak@lisa:/rep/emacs$ lua
>> Lua 5.1.1 Copyright (C) 1994-2006 Lua.org, PUC-Rio
>> > lfs=require("lfs");
>> > for i,v in pairs(lfs.attributes(".")) do print(i,v) end
>> dev 65024
>> change 1187946230
>> access 1187970537
>> rdev 0
>> nlink 20
>> blksize 4096
>> uid 1001
>> blocks 8
>> gid 1001
>> ino 42116897
>> mode directory
>> modification 1187946230
>> size 4096
>> >
>>
>> Uh, where are the permissions? A lot less important information is
>> given.
>
> Just the type of a file is returned (mode directory) in the current
> release of LuaFileSystem.
Considering the painstaking detail and completeness in the other
entries, this looks more like an oversight than a conscious design
decision to me.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum