Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see)
- From: roberto@... (Roberto Ierusalimschy)
- Date: 2007年8月22日 15:13:44 -0300
> That's true, but some discipline can solve that. The usual
> programming style in Scheme is functional, so side-effects are hardly
> an issue.
That is exactly my point. Multiple-shot continuations may be useful for
Scheme (although I haven't seen *convincing* evidence [1]), but not for
Lua, where side effects are the norm.
[1] The existence of several toolkits only shows that the technique
is useful for creating toolkits :) Whether it is useful for real
applications remains unclear.
-- Roberto
- References:
- Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), David Given
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Fabien
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Alex Queiroz
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Alex Queiroz
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Alex Queiroz
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Alex Queiroz