Re: Resumable VM Patch (-- is it dead) / Coco / etc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: Resumable VM Patch (-- is it dead) / Coco / etc
• From: Vyachelsav Egorov <mraleph@...>
• Date: 2007年8月22日 11:30:29 +0700

---

Mike Pall wrote:

Most library functions (including pcall and yield) aren't C functions anymore.

Have you adopted some kind of Jikes RVM approach (Lua VM written in Lua) or something else?

--
e.v.e

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Resumable VM Patch (-- is it dead) / Coco / etc, Mike Pall

• References:
  • Resumable VM Patch (-- is it dead) / Coco / etc, Thomas Harning Jr.
  • Re: Resumable VM Patch (-- is it dead) / Coco / etc, Mike Pall

• Prev by Date: Re: Features you would like to see
• Next by Date: throw C++ exceptions in C++ library codes
• Previous by thread: Re: Resumable VM Patch (-- is it dead) / Coco / etc
• Next by thread: Re: Resumable VM Patch (-- is it dead) / Coco / etc
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread