RE: Iteration and nils
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: RE: Iteration and nils
- From: "Jerome Vuarand" <jerome.vuarand@...>
- Date: 2007年8月16日 12:12:00 -0400
Luis Carvalho wrote:
>> The recent thread about lists and nil got me thinking about the ways
>> in which nil isn't a first-class data type in Lua. Of course, the
>> focus of that thread was on sparse arrays and vararg lists. I've
>> been thinking about another limitation of nil -- that the generic
>> for loop doesn't allow an iterator to provide nil as a value.
>
> <snip>
>
> Another approach -- already mentioned several times here -- is to use
> tuples.
> You could then pass and return tuples to/from vararg functions. It
> would be easy to iterate over them (similarly to ipairs but checking
> for the number of arguments instead of a nil value), and the
> iteration would respect nils. Moreover, tuples can be implemented as
> closures and no change to the language would be necessary (a new
> datatype is a big change, btw).
I thought that a new iterator on ... would solve the problem without
having to modify the language. I found out while looking for 'apairs'
that it was proposed last year by Mark Hamburg [1], with the name
varargs(), Mike Pall [2] proposing a more elegant apairs() name.
Unfortunately neither of them proposed an implementation. Since it's
trivial here is a simple (tested) implementation:
function apairs(...)
local n = select('#', ...)
return function(a, i)
if i < n then
return i+1,a[i+1]
end
end, {...}, 0
end
function f(...)
for i,a in apairs(...) do
print(i, a)
end
end
f("foo", nil, 32, nil)
[1] http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2006-04/msg00108.html
[2] http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2006-04/msg00114.html