Vijay Aswadhati wrote: > On Saturday, February 10, 2007 8:13 AM, David Given wrote: >> (Alternatively, develop on OpenBSD --- it does this kind of validation >> automatically, all the time!) > > Is that true for FreeBSD as well? I don't believe so (although they may well be thinking of porting the changes, they're extremely nifty). > Also, any good references that provide information in choosing between > FreeBSD and OpenBSD would be appreciated. The cliched summary is that NetBSD does portability, FreeBSD does ix86 performance, and OpenBSD does security. Personally, I'd recommend OpenBSD for any serious installation; I've used it in the past. It's smooth and professional and Just Works, but it does demand respect. You need to be prepared to sit down and learn how to do things, or it'll eat you alive. But it's all beautifully consistent (the firewall subsystem is a work of art), superbly documented and is packed full of handy security features. For example, check out the malloc() man page: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=malloc&sektion=3&arch=i386&apropos=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current There's a Lua package for it, too. -- ┌── ｄｇ＠ｃｏｗｌａｒｋ．ｃｏｍ ─── http://www.cowlark.com ─────────────────── │ "I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my │ telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to │ use my telephone." --- Bjarne Stroustrup
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature