Re: The "i" in "ipairs" (was re: Newbie: ipairs() for tables with non integer keys)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: The "i" in "ipairs" (was re: Newbie: ipairs() for tables with non integer keys)
• From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>
• Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 12:45:20 -0200

---

> I'm pretty sure that it was "I" through "M"
"I" through "N" mostly likely, so that you could write
	do 10 i=1,n
--lhf

---

• References:
  • Re: The "i" in "ipairs" (was re: Newbie: ipairs() for tables with non integer keys), Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • RE: The "i" in "ipairs" (was re: Newbie: ipairs() for tables with non integer keys), Paul Hudson
  • Re: The "i" in "ipairs" (was re: Newbie: ipairs() for tables with non integer keys), Steve Heller

• Prev by Date: Re: The "i" in "ipairs" (was re: Newbie: ipairs() for tables with non integer keys)
• Next by Date: Re: The "i" in "ipairs" (was re: Newbie: ipairs() for tables with non integer keys)
• Previous by thread: Re: The "i" in "ipairs" (was re: Newbie: ipairs() for tables with non integer keys)
• Next by thread: Re: The "i" in "ipairs" (was re: Newbie: ipairs() for tables with non integer keys)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread