Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn
- From: Stephen Kellett <lua@...>
- Date: 2006年1月26日 14:48:13 +0000
In message <1138271544.16983.33.camel@localhost.localdomain>, Michael T.
Richter <ttmrichter@gmail.com> writes
Actually I never used Logo at all, so you're a step ahead of me. :-) I
moved from BASIC to Assembly (6502) of all things.
You are not alone. I made the jump from CBM Basic on my VIC-20 to 6502
assembler using the VIC-20 add in cartridge. Years later I had to write
a few lines of Basic (this time on a C64) and realized that I couldn't -
even though I could write huge amounts of assembly without effort.
That was a long time ago :-)
Stephen
--
Stephen Kellett
Object Media Limited http://www.objmedia.demon.co.uk/software.html
Computer Consultancy, Software Development
Windows C++, Java, Assembler, Performance Analysis, Troubleshooting
- References:
- Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Vijay Aswadhati
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Chris Marrin
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Keith Wiles
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Alen Ladavac
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Tom Reahard
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Brian Weed
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Walter Cruz
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Ben Sunshine-Hill
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, mnewberry
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Chris Marrin
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Lisa Parratt
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Michael T. Richter
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Lisa Parratt
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Michael T. Richter