Re: splitting camel case?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: splitting camel case?
- From: Rob Kendrick <lua-l@...>
- Date: 2006年1月15日 02:35:33 +0000
On Sat, 2006年01月14日 at 20:09 -0600, David Gish wrote:
<snip>
> Much better, but problematic cases are still fairly easy to construct:
>
> "componentWithAURL"
<snip>
> The first one's a bit contrived, I admit,
Well, yes - it should be "componentWithAnURL" which also solves the
problem :)
--
Rob Kendrick <lua-l@nun.org.uk>