Re: #s semantics (was Re: Lua 5.1-work6 cumulative PATCH #1)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: #s semantics (was Re: Lua 5.1-work6 cumulative PATCH #1)
- From: Rici Lake <lua@...>
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 18:45:20 -0500
On 3-Aug-05, at 6:31 PM, Mark Hamburg wrote:
But I find it odd to allow length to get redefined for tables and not
for
strings and there seemed to be a strong consensus for not redefining
it for
strings. So, I was looking for a way to make it consistent.
It is consistent with allowing + to be defined for tables but not for
numbers. I guess that's why I don't find it weird that # should be
(re)definable for tables but not for strings.