Re: NaNs etc. once again. Was: Re: 5.1 and vc6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: NaNs etc. once again. Was: Re: 5.1 and vc6
• From: Rici Lake <lua@...>
• Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 09:02:55 -0500

---

On 6-Mar-05, at 10:13 PM, Shannon Stewman wrote:

Sure, but nil isn't a number type, and is rather overloaded as is. I
can see the advantage of having NaN test to false, but where is the
advantage of letting nil and NaN be equivalent?

I'd be happy with just having NaN test to false.

---

• References:
  • 5.1 and vc6, David Burgess
  • Re: 5.1 and vc6, Wim Couwenberg
  • NaNs etc. once again. Was: Re: 5.1 and vc6, Rici Lake
  • Re: NaNs etc. once again. Was: Re: 5.1 and vc6, Shannon Stewman
  • Re: NaNs etc. once again. Was: Re: 5.1 and vc6, Rici Lake
  • Re: NaNs etc. once again. Was: Re: 5.1 and vc6, Shannon Stewman

• Prev by Date: Re: 51w5 table resize regressions
• Next by Date: Re: Lua + Delphi
• Previous by thread: Re: NaNs etc. once again. Was: Re: 5.1 and vc6
• Next by thread: debug.getinfo()?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread