Re: 5.1w1 aborts
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: 5.1w1 aborts
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: 2004年9月10日 14:21:28 -0300
> This one implies that the test in checkliveness() failed since isdead()
> was true. I.e. mt->marked has WHITE0BIT set, but g->currentwhite has
> WHITE1BIT set.
>From where did you get the value of `g->currentwhite'?
> After staring a while at lgc.c I think something is either wrong with
> luaC_barrierf() or luaC_barrierback() or the use of these via the
> luaC_*barrier* macros from lgc.h.
Why do you think that? What sounds strange to you?
-- Roberto