QtMoko audio state work

Thu Jan 17 15:23:00 CET 2013

On Thursday, January 17, 2013 12:49:04, Radek Polak wrote:
> On Thursday, January 17, 2013 01:52:57 AM Neil Jerram wrote:
>> > (In general, for some reason, it appears that the floating point code
> > in Pulseaudio and its dependencies doesn't run any better on armhf
> > than it does on armel.)
>> Hi Neil,
> do you have also armhf compiled kernel? I had armel kernel + armhf rootfs and 
> it was even slower then pure armel. 

Ah, interesting. After I managed to
build QtMoko for armhf, I installed it in
the experimental wheezy/armhf rootfs
that you released a few months ago.
So it depends what the kernel in that
rootfs was.
> Btw i am using armhf for a few weeks now 
> and i think i could make a release - just few apps are missing.

Nice! I am looking forward to that.
 Neil