September 2003 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Sep 1 00:46:02 PDT 2003
Ending: Tue Sep 30 21:13:02 PDT 2003
Messages: 213

• [EM] IRV vs. Runoff Steve Barney
• [EM] Re: IRV vs. Runoff Steve Barney
• [EM] Re: IRV vs. Runoff Steve Barney
• [EM] Re: IRV - Approval, Condorcet-Approval hybrids Chris Benham
• [EM] IRV - Approval, Condorcet - Approval hybrids Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: IRV vs. Runoff Chris Benham
• [EM] Re:"Runoff without Elimination", Condorcet efficiency Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: IRV - Approval , Condorcet-Approval hybrids Chris Benham
• [EM] Re:"Runoff without Elimination", Condorcet efficiency Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Improved Generalised Bucklin Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: IRV-Approval hybrid Chris Benham
• [EM] Condorcet completed by limited-rank Condorcet! Chris Benham
• [EM] [Fwd: Re: Participation examples] Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Participation criterion: a thought Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Proposed method of cycle resolution Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Woodall's "Descending Acquiescing Coalitions" method Chris Benham
• [EM] Re: Woodall's "Descending Acquiescing Coalitions" method Chris Benham
• [EM] CR/Approval method, RWE Chris Benham
• [EM] Gilmour - Parliamentary question for you? Donald Davison
• [EM] (CIRCLE) Cardinal [I] Rating Condorcet Loser Elimination Donald Davison
• [EM] David's letter of September 3 Donald Davison
• [EM] Re: Extremism Donald Davison
• [EM] Re: Diana's Proposed method of cycle resolution: Donald Davison
• [EM] James Gilmour and the Dumb Question: Donald Davison
• [EM] Reply to Robertas' Request for Opinion: Donald Davison
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality: IRV examples, PR Anthony Duff
• [EM] Donald's Reply to Robertas' Request for Opinion: Anthony Duff
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy Diana Galletly
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy Diana Galletly
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy Diana Galletly
• [EM] Participation criterion: a thought Diana Galletly
• Fwd: [EM] Participation criterion: a thought Diana Galletly
• [EM] Participation criterion: a thought Diana Galletly
• [EM] Participation criterion: a thought Diana Galletly
• [EM] Proposed method of cycle resolution Diana Galletly
• [EM] Proposed method of cycle resolution Diana Galletly
• [EM] Proposed method of cycle resolution Diana Galletly
• [EM] Proposed method of cycle resolution Diana Galletly
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy Diana Galletly
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy Diana Galletly
• [EM] Request for Information Simon Gazeley
• [EM] Request for opinion Simon Gazeley
• [EM] Query for one and all James Gilmour
• [EM] Dumb question James Gilmour
• [EM] Request for opinion James Gilmour
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates Eric Gorr
• Fwd: [EM] Query for Approval advocates Eric Gorr
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates Eric Gorr
• [EM] RWE, Participation Eric Gorr
• [EM] RWE, Participation Eric Gorr
• [EM] RWE, Participation Eric Gorr
• [EM] Participation criterion: a thought Eric Gorr
• [EM] Participation criterion: a thought Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Participation criterion: a thought Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Participation criterion: a thought Eric Gorr
• [EM] Re: Diana's Proposed method of cycle resolution: Eric Gorr
• [EM] requesing help in converting pairwise matrix into preference rankings James Green-Armytage
• [EM] explanation of next four postings James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Approval voting under fire #2 (Mike Ossipoff) James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Approval voting under fire #3 (James) James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Approval voting under fire #4 (Mike Ossipoff) James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Approval voting under fire #1 (James) James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Query for one and all John B. Hodges
• [EM] Query for one and all John B. Hodges
• [EM] Query for one and all John B. Hodges
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality John B. Hodges
• [EM] Extremism John B. Hodges
• [EM] Dumb question John B. Hodges
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates Bart Ingles
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates Bart Ingles
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality Bart Ingles
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality Bart Ingles
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality Bart Ingles
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality Bart Ingles
• [EM] Participation criterion: a thought Bart Ingles
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy Bart Ingles
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy Bart Ingles
• [EM] Cardinal Rating Condorcet Loser Elimination Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity Dave Ketchum
• [EM] By the People Dave Ketchum
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality Dave Ketchum
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Participation criterion: a thought Gervase Lam
• [EM] Call for Ideas on Automatic Approval Cutoff Finding Gervase Lam
• [EM] Re: Truncation, defeat strength, Landau Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: IRV vs. Plurality Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: CRCLE ( Resolving Cycles- Margins Doesn't Do Very Well ) Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Re: IRV vs. Plurality Joe Mason
• [EM] Request for Ranked Pair strategy holes (margin, rm & wv) Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] RP(wv) to protect any Condorcet Winner Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Dumb question Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Single-winner method to PR, part II Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Dumb question - Misunderstanding Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Dumb question - Misunderstanding Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Dumb question - across parties Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Dumb question - Misunderstanding Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Dumb question Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Sorry for multiple posting Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Dumb question Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Dumb question - Misunderstanding Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Single-winner method to PR, part II Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Query for one and all Markus Schulze
• [EM] Query for one and all Markus Schulze
• [EM] Query for one and all Markus Schulze
• [EM] Query for one and all Markus Schulze
• [EM] Query for one and all Markus Schulze
• [EM] Truncation, defeat strength, Landau Markus Schulze
• [EM] Truncation, defeat strength, Landau Markus Schulze
• [EM] Beatpath and SSD, Goldfish Markus Schulze
• [EM] Theoretical Justification for "Winning-Votes" Markus Schulze
• [EM] requesing help in converting pairwise matrix into preference rankings Markus Schulze
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy Markus Schulze
• [EM] Approval, IGB, and Participation Markus Schulze
• [EM] Dumb question Markus Schulze
• [EM] Proposed method of cycle resolution Markus Schulze
• [EM] Dumb question - Misunderstanding Markus Schulze
• [EM] Proposed method of cycle resolution Markus Schulze
• [EM] Schulze; Beatpath Method; Schwartz Sequential Dropping Markus Schulze
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy Markus Schulze
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity Forest Simmons
• [EM] Query for one and all, Clones Forest Simmons
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity/Orphan Forest Simmons
• [EM] Query, Clones, MCA levels, Participation Forest Simmons
• [EM] Truncation Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Truncation Forest Simmons
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality Forest Simmons
• [EM] Approval Voting and Classical Mechanics Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: IRV vs. Plurality Forest Simmons
• [EM] issue space revisited Forest Simmons
• [EM] "Runoff Without Elimination," Condorcet efficiency Forest Simmons
• [EM] Call for Ideas on Automatic Approval Cutoff Finding Forest Simmons
• [EM] Approval Voting and Classical Mechanics Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: IRV vs. Plurality Forest Simmons
• [EM] Call for Ideas on Automatic Approval Cutoff Finding Forest Simmons
• [EM] Call for Ideas on Automatic Approval Cutoff Finding Forest Simmons
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality Forest Simmons
• [EM] Condorcet completed by limited-rank Condorcet! Forest Simmons
• [EM] Call for Ideas on Automatic Approval Cutoff Finding Forest Simmons
• [EM] Call for Ideas on Automatic Approval Cutoff Finding Forest Simmons
• [EM] another CR/Approval method Forest Simmons
• [EM] another CR/Approval method Forest Simmons
• [EM] another CR/Approval method Forest Simmons
• [EM] CR/Approval method, RWE Forest Simmons
• [EM] Cheering for simplicity Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Truncation, defeat strength Alex Small
• [EM] Truncation, defeat strength, Landau Alex Small
• [EM] Retraction--Approval Voting and Classical Mechanics Alex Small
• [EM] Extremism Alex Small
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy Alex Small
• [EM] Programming Question Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Diana's Proposed method of cycle resolution: Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Diana's Proposed method of cycle resolution: Alex Small
• [EM] Re: Truncation, defeat strength Adam Tarr
• [EM] Request for Ranked Pair strategy holes (margin, rm & wv) Adam Tarr
• [EM] IRV-Approval, Condorcet-Approval hybrids Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Query for one and all Kevin Venzke
• [EM] IRV-Approval, Condorcet-Approval hybrids Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: IRV - Approval, Condorcet-Approval hybrids Kevin Venzke
• [EM] MCA Participation failure example Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Query for one and all Kevin Venzke
• [EM] ESBS Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Query for one and all, Clones Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Query, Clones, MCA levels, Participation Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Truncation, defeat strength Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Truncation, defeat strength, Landau Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Beatpath and SSD, Goldfish Kevin Venzke
• [EM] CRCLE ( Resolving Cycles- Margins Doesn't Do Very Well ) Kevin Venzke
• [EM] IRV - Approval, Condorcet - Approval hybrids Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: CRCLE ( Resolving Cycles- Margins Doesn't Do Very Well ) Kevin Venzke
• [EM] "Runoff Without Elimination," Condorcet efficiency Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re:"Runoff without Elimination", Condorcet efficiency Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re:"Runoff without Elimination", Condorcet efficiency Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RWE, Participation Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RWE, Participation Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RWE, Participation Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Woodall's "Descending Acquiescing Coalitions" method Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Call for Ideas on Automatic Approval Cutoff Finding Kevin Venzke
• [EM] to Donald (re David's message) Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: IRV-Approval hybrid Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Participation examples Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Participation criterion: a thought Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Approval, IGB, and Participation Kevin Venzke
• [EM] CR, MCA; another CR/Approval method Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Proposed method of cycle resolution Kevin Venzke
• [EM] another CR/Approval method Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: CR/Approval Kevin Venzke
• [EM] another CR/Approval method Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Diana's Proposed method of cycle resolution: Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Woodall's "Descending Acquiescing Coalitions" method Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Re: Woodall's DAC, Plurality Kevin Venzke
• [EM] re: CR/Approval and cutoffs Kevin Venzke
• [EM] CR/Approval method, RWE Kevin Venzke
• [EM] IRV-Approval, Condorcet-Approval hybrids Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] (CIRCLE) Cardinal [I] Rating Condorcet Loser Elimination Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] CRCLE ( Resolving Cycles- Ranked Pairs Doesn't Do Very Well ) Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] CRCLE ( Resolving Cycles- Margins Doesn't Do Very Well ) Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] CRCLE Response to Donald Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Request for Information Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] IRV vs. Plurality Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Methods, and the criteria they satisfy Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] Re: Participation criterion: a thought Dgamble997 at aol.com
• [EM] (no subject) Dgamble997 at aol.com
• Fwd: [EM] Query for Approval advocates Kislanko at aol.com
• [EM] Query for Approval advocates Kislanko at aol.com
• Fwd: [EM] Participation criterion: a thought Kislanko at aol.com
• [EM] Participation criterion: a thought Kislanko at aol.com
• Fwd: [EM] Re: Participation criterion: a thought Kislanko at aol.com
• Fwd: [EM] Re: Diana's Proposed method of cycle resolution: Kislanko at aol.com
• [EM] Request for opinion robertas pogorelis
• [EM] Dumb question stephane.rouillon at sympatico.ca
• [EM] Dumb question stephane.rouillon at sympatico.ca

Last message date: Tue Sep 30 21:13:02 PDT 2003
Archived on: Sun Jun 29 22:31:12 PDT 2014

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

---

This archive was generated by Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition).