[WriteLog] Writelog's Future

Thu Nov 22 12:27:50 EST 2007

Would if I could, Joe. Good to hear it's possible. Maybe someone 
with more knowledge than I will pick up the challenge.
Thanks for the information.
73, Mark WA9IVH
On Nov 22, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>>> We certainly could use a DigPan (or similar) plug in for PSK-31.
>> Ideally, this would be integrated with WriteLog as elegantly
>> as MMTTY is for RTTY.
>> Why don't you write the wrapper for MMVARI just as someone else
> did for MMTTY many years ago? MMVARI is available as an OCX and
> only needs the appropriate interface for WriteLog to use is as a
> "loadable TNC."
>> Writelog provides an excellent PSK31 decoder in RTTYrite which
> works better than DigiPan or MMVARI exactly because it uses
> narrow filters in the receiver rather than look at a 3 KHz chunk
> of the band. High performance PSK31 is absolutely impossible
> with wideband decoders because one either has 'unwanted' signals
> pumping the AGC or creating IMD in the receiver if the AGC is
> disabled.
>> 73,
>> ... Joe, W4TV
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: writelog-bounces at contesting.com
>> [mailto:writelog-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mark Klocksin
>> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 8:14 AM
>> To: writelog at contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Writelog's Future
>>>>>>>> We certainly could use a DigPan (or similar) plug in for PSK-31.
>> Ideally, this would be integrated with WriteLog as elegantly
>> as MMTTY
>> is for RTTY.
>>>> This functionality is currently a major weakness of this otherwise
>> excellent program.
>>>> 73, Mark WA9IVH
>>>>>>>> On Nov 22, 2007, at 2:55 AM, Aleksander Otulak wrote:
>>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>>> I bought Writelog a week ago having decided to do so
>>> basis a general opinion it is the best software for
>>> digitally transmitted contests. However, on opening it
>>> I was shocked as, according to present standards,
>>> its RTTY and PSK interfaces look (gently saying) obsolete.
>>> The implementation of MMTTY helped a bit, however,
>>> it has actually reduced available digital contests to RTTY only.
>>>>>> So, my two questions are:
>>> Are the owners of Writelog interested in further development
>>> of the software ?
>>> Are there a team of Writelog developers and/or beta testers
>>> to whom we could address our wish lists ?
>>>>>>>>> Yours,
>>> Alec/SP2EWQ
>>>>> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/