Cognitive Science of Religion and the Study of Theological Concepts
- Published:
- Volume 33, pages 487–497, (2014)
- Cite this article
-
1083 Accesses
-
3 Altmetric
Abstract
The cultural transmission of theological concepts remains an underexplored topic in the cognitive science of religion (CSR). In this paper, I examine whether approaches from CSR, especially the study of content biases in the transmission of beliefs, can help explain the cultural success of some theological concepts. This approach reveals that there is more continuity between theological beliefs and ordinary religious beliefs than CSR authors have hitherto recognized: the cultural transmission of theological concepts is influenced by content biases that also underlie the reception of ordinary religious concepts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (Japan)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
What Does the Cognitive Science of Religion Explain?
Spiritual oneness and the cognitive science of religion
Notes
For the sake of brevity and scope, I will leave aside the role of context biases in the transmission of theological concepts. I take it as uncontroversial that they are important for providing a full account of the cultural evolution of theological views.
These ratios were computed using an ordered logit/cumulative logit model. Thanks to Robert O’Brien, a medical statistician at Miami University, for help with this calculation.
References
al-Ghazālī. [eleventh century (1963)]. Incoherence of the philosophers. (S.A. Kamali, Trans.) Pakistan Philosophical Congress,Lahore
Armstrong M (2011) Extraordinary eschatology: Insights from ordinary theology. In: Astley J, Francis LJ (eds) Exploring ordinary theology. Everyday Christian believing and the church. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 97–105
Astuti R, Harris PL (2008) Understanding mortality and the life of the ancestors in rural Madagascar. Cognit Sci 32:713–740
Augustine [fifth century (1886)]. Psalm 89. In: Schaff P (ed) Exposition on the book of psalms. T & T Clark, Edinburgh and Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, MI, pp 429–441
Banerjee K, Bloom P (2012) Would Tarzan believe in God? Conditions for the emergence of religious belief. Trends Cognit Sci 17:7–8
Barrett JL (2011) Cognitive science, religion, and theology. From human minds to divine minds. Templeton Press, West Conshohocken
Barrett JL, Keil FC (1996) Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cogn Psychol 31:219–247
Barrett JL, Nyhof MA (2001) Spreading non-natural concepts: the role of intuitive conceptual structures in memory and transmission of cultural materials. J Cognit Cult 1:69–100
Barrett HC, Broesch T, Scott RM, He Z, Baillargeon R, Wu D, Bolz D, Henrich J, Setoh P, Wang J, Laurence S (2013) Early false-belief understanding in traditional non-Western societies. Proc Royal Soci B Biol Sci 280:1471–2954
Bering JM, McLeod K, Shackelford T (2005) Reasoning about dead agents reveals possible adaptive trends. Human Nature 16:360–381
Bloom P (2004) Descartes’ baby. How child development explains what makes us human. Arrow Books, London
Boyer P (2002) Religion explained. The evolutionary origins of religious thought. Vintage, London
Claidière N, Sperber D (2007) The role of attraction in cultural evolution. J Cognit Cult 7:89–111
De Cruz H, De Smedt J (2007) The role of intuitive ontologies in scientific understanding—The case of human evolution. Biol Philos 22:351–368
De Cruz H, De Smedt J (2010) Paley’s iPod: the cognitive basis of the design argument within natural theology. Zygon J Religion Sci 45:665–684
Edwards M (2009) Catholicity and heresy in the early church. Ashgate, Farnham
Ehrman BD (2003) Lost Christianities. The battles for scripture and the faiths we never knew. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Faust J (2008) Can religious arguments persuade? Int J Philos Relig 63:71–86
Gervais WM, Henrich J (2010) The Zeus problem: why representational content biases cannot explain faith in gods. J Cognit Cult 10:383–389
Gervais WM, Willard AK, Norenzayan A, Henrich J (2011) The cultural transmission of faith. Why innate intuitions are necessary, but insufficient, to explain religious belief. Religion 41:389–410
Griffel F (2009) Al-Ghazālī’s philosophical theology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Henrich J, Boyd R (2002) On modeling cognition and culture. Why cultural evolution does not require replication of representations. J Cognit Cult 2:87–112
Heywood B, Bering J (in press). Meant to be: how religious beliefs and cultural religiosity affect the implicit bias to think teleologically. Religion, Brain and Behavior
Hodge KM (2011) On imagining the afterlife. J Cognit Cult 11:367–389
Hume D (1757) The natural history of religion. In: Four dissertations. A. Millar, London, pp 1–117
Hume D (1779) Dialogues concerning natural religion. Hafner, London
Irenaeus [second century (1884)] Against heresies (trans: Roberts A, Rambaut WH). T & T Clark, Edinburgh
Jenkins P (2010) Jesus wars. How four patriarchs, three queens, and two emperors decided what Christians would believe for the next 1,500 years. SPCK, London
Kelemen D (2004) Are children "intuitive theists"? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychol Sci 15:295–301
Legare CH, Gelman SA (2008) Bewitchment, biology, or both: the coexistence of natural and supernatural explanatory frameworks across development. Cognit Sci 32:607–642
McCauley RN (2011) Why religion is natural and science is not. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Mercier H (2012) The social functions of explicit coherence evaluation. Mind Soc 11:81–92
Mercier H, Sperber D (2011) Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behav Brain Sci 34:57–74
Murphy N (2011) Immortality versus resurrection in the Christian tradition. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1234:76–82
Nähri J (2008) Beautiful reflections: the cognitive and evolutionary foundations of paradise representations. Method Theory Study Religion 20:339–365
Nichols S (2002) On the genealogy of norms: a case for the role of emotion in cultural evolution. Philos Sci 69:234–255
Nichols R, Draper P (2013) Diagnosing cognitive biases in philosophy of religion. The Monist
Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol 2:175–220
Pospisil LJ (1978) The Kapauku Papuans of West New Guinea. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York
Rottman J, Kelemen D (2012) Is there such a thing as a Christian child? Evidence of religious beliefs in early childhood. In: McNamara P, Wildman W (eds) Science and the world’s religions: origins and destinies. Praeger, Santa Barbara, pp 205–238
Samarapungavan A, Wiers RW (1997) Children’s thoughts on the origin of species: a study of explanatory coherence. Cognit Sci 21:147–177
Schwitzgebel E (2013) The crazyist metaphysics of mind. http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~eschwitz/SchwitzPapers/CrazyMind-130305.pdf
Slone DJ (2004) Theological incorrectness. Why religious people believe what they shouldn’t. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Sperber D (1997) Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind Lang 12:67–83
van Inwagen P (1978) The possibility of resurrection. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9, 114–121 (reprinted and revised in 1998, The possibility of resurrection and other essays in Christian apologetics. In: van Inwagen P (ed) Westview Press, Boulder, pp 45–51
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to Hugo Mercier, Ryan Nichols, Eric Schwitzgebel and Johan De Smedt for their suggestions to earlier versions of this manuscript. This research has been financially supported by a travel grant to Oxford from the Research Foundation Flanders.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Cruz, H. Cognitive Science of Religion and the Study of Theological Concepts. Topoi 33, 487–497 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-013-9168-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-013-9168-9
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative