Skip to main content
Log in

Semantic Service Description Framework for Address

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

For the last decade, the study on semantic Web Services has become an important research topic in the fields of the Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) and Grid computing. The key objective of semantic Web Services is to achieve automatic Web Service discovery, invocation and composition. There are several existing works that have proposed some semantic description frameworks such as OWL-S, WSDL-S and WSMO. However, these works are only focusing on ontology-based data-type semantics of the service capabilities and have not considered making use of contextual information about Web Services, which we believe more effective and natural for describing Web Services. Based on the existing work, the requirements have to be precise to locate services, which is difficult in most of the cases because if a service requester is not an expert in the required service's domain, it is impractical to provide a precise requirement. To address these problems, a context-based semantic service description framework is proposed in this chapter. This framework focuses on not only the capabilities of Web Services, but also the usage context information of Web Services so that the service requester can locate services by specifying how they want to use them rather than the type and interface of the services when they are not sure about it. We combine the conceptual graphs (CGs) and non-monotonic logic technologies into the framework for addressing the imprecise requirement issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Similar content being viewed by others

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Agarwal, S., Handschuh, S., & Staab, S. (2005) Annotation, Composition and Invocation of Semantic Web Services, Journal of Web Semantics, 2(1).

  • Akkiraju, R., Farrell, J., Miller, J., Nagarajan, M., Schmidt, M., Sheth, A., & Verma, K. (2005) Web Service Semantics — WSDL-S, A joint UGA-IBM Tchnical Note, version 1.2, April 18, 2005, http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/projects/METEOR-S/WSDL-S

  • Antoniou, G., Bikakis, A., & Wagner, G. (2004) A System for Nonmonotonic Rules on the Web, Rules and Rule Mark-up Languages for the Semantic Web, LNCS Vol. 3323, pp. 23–36, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg .

  • Brewka, G. (2001) On the Relationship between Defeasible Logic and Well-Founded Semantics, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Vienna Austria, September 2001, LNCS 2173, pp. 121–132.

  • Christensen, E., Curbera, F., Meredith, G., & Weerawarana, S. (2001) Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1, http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl

  • Du, X., Song, W., & Munro, M. (2006) Using Common Process Patterns for Semantic Web Services Composition, to appear in Proc. of 15th International Conference on Information System Development (ISD2006), Budapest, Hungary, August 31—September 2, 2006

  • Foster, I., Kesselman, C., & Tuecke, S. (2001) The Anatomy of the Grid: Enabling Scalable Virtual Organizations, International Journal of Supercomputer Applications, 15(3).

  • Frakes, W.B. & Baeza-Yates, R. (1992) Information Retrieval: Data Structures & Algorithms, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

  • Guha, R., McCool, R., & Fikes, R. (2004) Contexts for the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of the ISWC'04, Hiroshima, Japan, November 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3298, pp. 32–46, Springer.

  • Huhns, M.N. & Singh, M.P. (2005) Service Oriented Computing: key concepts and principles, IEEE Intelligent System, January—February 2005, pp. 75–81.

  • Ludwig, S. & Reyhani, S. (2005) Semantic Approach to Service Discovery in a Grid Environment, Journal of Web Semantics, 3(4).

  • Martin, D., Burstein, M., Hobbs, J., Lassila, O., McDermott, D., Mcllraith, S., Narayanan, S., Paolucci, M., Parsia, B., Payne, T., Sirin, E., Srinivasan, N., & Sycara, K. (2004) OWL-S: Semantic Mark-up for Web Services, http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.0/owl-s.html

  • Montes-y-Gómez, M., Gelbukh, A., López-López, A., & Baeza-Yates, R. (2001) Flexible Comparison of Conceptual Graphs, Proceeding of 12th International Conference and Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. LNCS 2113, Springer, 2001, pp. 102–111.

  • Nute, D. (1994) Defeasible logic, in Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming (vol. 3): Non-monotonic Reasoning and Uncertain Reasoning, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Nute, D. (1987) Defeasible Reasoning, 20th International Conference on Systems Science, Hawaii, IEEE Press, pp. 470–477.

  • Paolucci, M., Sycara, K., & Kawamuwa, T. (2003) Delivering Semantic Web Services, in Proceedings of WWW2003, pp. 829–836, May 20–24, 2003, Budapest, Hungary.

  • Puder, A., Markwitz, S., Gudermann, F., & Geihs, K. (1995) AI-based Trading in Open Distributed Environments, In: Proc. IFIP International Conference on Open Distributed Processing, Brisbane/Australia.

  • Roman, D., Keller, U., Lausen, H., Bruijn, J., Lara, R., Stollberg, M., Polleres, A., Feier, C., Bussler, C., & Fensel, D. (2005) Web Service Modelling Ontology (WSMO), WSMO Final Draft, April 13, 2005, http://www.w3.org/Submission/WSMO/

  • Song, W. (2006) A Semantic Modelling Approach to Automatic Services Analysis and Composition, in proceeding of the IASTED International Conference on Web Technologies, Applications, and Services (WTAS), Calgary, Canada, July 17–19, 2006.

  • Song, W. & Li, X. (2005) A Conceptual Modeling Approach to Virtual Organizations in the Grid to appear in Proceedings of GCC2005 (eds. Zhuge and Fox), Springer LNCS 3795, pp. 382–393.

  • Sowa, J.F. (1976) Conceptual Graphs for a Data Base Interface, IBM Journal of Research and Development, 20(4), 336–357.

  • Sowa, J.F. (1984) Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine, Addison-Wesley, Canada.

  • UDDI 3.0 Specification (2002), http://uddi.org/pubs/uddi-v3.00-published-20020719.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science Department, University of Durham, UK

    William Song & Malcolm Munro

Authors
  1. Xiaofeng Du
  2. William Song
  3. Malcolm Munro

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Business Information Systems Group J.E. Cairnes School of Business & Economics, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland

    Chris Barry

  2. Business Information Systems Group J.E. Cairnes School of Business & Economics, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland

    Michael Lang

  3. Department of Electrical Computer Engineering, Boise State University, 1910 University Dr. MEC 202C, Boise, ID, 83725-2075, USA

    Wita Wojtkowski

  4. Business Information Systems Group J.E. Cairnes School of Business & Economics, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland

    Kieran Conboy

  5. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Boise State University, 1910 University Dr. MEC 202C, Boise, ID, 83725-2075, USA

    Gregory Wojtkowski

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Du, X., Song, W., Munro, M. (2009). Semantic Service Description Framework for Address. In: Barry, C., Lang, M., Wojtkowski, W., Conboy, K., Wojtkowski, G. (eds) Information Systems Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78578-3_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78578-3_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-78577-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-78578-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer Science Computer Science (R0)

Publish with us

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /