Result Summary for Survey:Post IWSP4 Survey

Post IWSP4 Survey
1. Optional - Your email address (in case we want to discuss your ideas further). Thanks.
2. Optional - Your name (see question 1).
3. To which of the following groups do you belong? Please select all that apply.
answered question69
skipped question
0
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Basic Scientist/Physiologist30.4%21
Industry Representative - Devices14.5%10
Industry Representative - Clinical Trials1.4%1
Industry Representative - Other0.0%0
Physician - Epileptologist8.7%6
Physician - Neurologist7.2%5
Physician - Neurosurgeon0.0%0
Physician - Other0.0%0
Physicist26.1%18
Mathematician13.0%9
Engineer44.9%31
viewOther (please specify)10.1%7
4. Please rank your primary reasons for attending IWSP4 in Kansas City? If you have other reasons for attending please add them in the Other box.
answered question69
skipped question
0
HighestHighMediumLowLowestN/ARating
Average
Response
Count
To learn about the work of others63.2% (43)36.8% (25)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)0.0% (0)1.3768
To share your work with others20.6% (14)39.7% (27)19.1% (13)5.9% (4)5.9% (4)8.8% (6)2.3168
To develop collaborations with other groups/researchers19.1% (13)45.6% (31)30.9% (21)1.5% (1)0.0% (0)2.9% (2)2.1568
viewOther (please specify)5
5. Was the format of the Kansas City meeting:
answered question69
skipped question
0
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Highly satisfactory72.5%50
Satisfactory27.5%19
Unsatisfactory0.0%0
6. If applicable, please identify any aspect/s of the meeting format you would improve upon and explain how you would improve it.
answered question33
skipped question
36
Response
Count
view 33
7. The ideal duration of the seizure prediction workshop is:
answered question69
skipped question
0
Response
Percent
Response
Count
4 days84.1%58
Less than 4 days10.1%7
More than 4 days0.0%0
viewIf more or less than 4 days, please enter the number of days.5.8%4
8. What topic/s covered in the meeting do you think were over-emphasized?
answered question34
skipped question
35
Response
Count
view 34
9. What topic/s covered in the meeting do you think were under-emphasized?
answered question40
skipped question
29
Response
Count
view 40
10. What was your favorite talk and why?
answered question38
skipped question
31
Response
Count
view 38
11. What was your favorite session and why?
answered question30
skipped question
39
Response
Count
view 30
12. What was your least favorite session and why?
answered question27
skipped question
42
Response
Count
view 27
13. Would you like more scheduled general discussion time?
answered question65
skipped question
4
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes55.4%36
No44.6%29
14. Do you think the seizure prediction/detection contest should continue?
answered question66
skipped question
3
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes92.4%61
No7.6%5
15. Do you have any remarks/feedback regarding the seizure prediction/detection contest?
answered question33
skipped question
36
Response
Count
view 33
16. Did you find the poster session valuable?
answered question68
skipped question
1
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes95.6%65
No4.4%3
17. Should the poster session be continued?
answered question69
skipped question
0
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes98.6%68
No1.4%1
18. Should prizes for best poster/s (regardless of whether money or awards) be continued?
answered question62
skipped question
7
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes90.3%56
No9.7%6
19. Was the time allotted to State of Seizure Prediction presentations (10 minutes):
answered question65
skipped question
4
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Just right56.9%37
Too long0.0%0
Too short43.1%28
20. Was the time allotted to questions and discussion of State of Seizure Prediction presentations (10 minutes):
answered question66
skipped question
3
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Just right71.2%47
Too long1.5%1
Too short27.3%18
21. Do you have any remarks/feedback regarding the industry-academia session?
answered question30
skipped question
39
Response
Count
view 30
22. Would you be interested in increased interactions between researchers in epilepsy/seizure prediction and researchers in other fields involving prediction in complex systems (e.g. seismology, meteorology, finance, etc.)?
answered question67
skipped question
2
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes77.6%52
No22.4%15
23. Would you like to see the debate session continued?
answered question66
skipped question
3
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes89.4%59
No10.6%7
24. If yes, what topics/questions would you like to see debated? Feel free to also suggest individuals you might like to see debate the issues you suggest.
answered question25
skipped question
44
Response
Count
view 25
25. Do you have any remarks/feedback regarding the debate session?
answered question22
skipped question
47
Response
Count
view 22
26. Do you have any comments/feedback regarding the Epilepsy for Engineers/Mathematicians/Physicists didactic course?
answered question32
skipped question
37
Response
Count
view 32
27. Do you have any comments/feedback regarding the Engineering/Math/Physics for MDs didactic course?
answered question28
skipped question
41
Response
Count
view 28
28. Would you like to see the didactic courses continued?
answered question66
skipped question
3
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes93.9%62
No6.1%4
29. What topics/lectures would you like to see removed from the didactic course?
answered question16
skipped question
53
Response
Count
view 16
30. What additional topics/lectures would you like to see added to a didactic course?
answered question21
skipped question
48
Response
Count
view 21
31. Are there any topics which were not addressed at the Kansas City meeting which should be addressed?
answered question17
skipped question
52
Response
Count
view 17
32. Are you planning to attend the 5th International Workshop on Seizure Prediction in Germany in Spring 2011?
answered question61
skipped question
8
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes91.8%56
No8.2%5
33. What are the factors that will influence your decision to attend/participate in the next workshop?
answered question33
skipped question
36
Response
Count
view 33
34. What do you hope to gain by attending the next workshop?
answered question31
skipped question
38
Response
Count
view 31
35. What do you think is the optimal frequency for this workshop series?
answered question67
skipped question
2
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Once every 12 months19.4%13
Once every 18 months49.3%33
Once every 24 months29.9%20
Longer1.5%1
36. The workshop series currently alternates between North America and Europe. Is this preferable? Please let us know your thoughts on this.
answered question37
skipped question
32
Response
Count
view 37
37. Would you be interested in having National Institutes of Health give a course on grantsmanship and funding opportunities?
answered question61
skipped question
8
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes59.0%36
No41.0%25
38. Should there be a dedicated session for presentations by graduate students?
answered question62
skipped question
7
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes58.1%36
No41.9%26
39. Should there be a data blitz - short 5 minute presentations in an informal setting?
answered question59
skipped question
10
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes61.0%36
No39.0%23
40. Would you be more or less interested in participating if sessions are audio and/or video taped and the contents hosted on the internet or provided to each participant?
answered question56
skipped question
13
Response
Percent
Response
Count
More interested57.1%32
Less interested42.9%24
41. Do you prefer that all participants be housed in the same hotel?
answered question59
skipped question
10
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes79.7%47
No20.3%12
42. Would you like to see more scheduled activities in the evenings?
answered question57
skipped question
12
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes40.4%23
No59.6%34
43. Would you like to see more meals provided even if registration is higher?
answered question58
skipped question
11
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes29.3%17
No70.7%41
44. Would you attend this workshop if we sought to raise a larger fraction of costs from registration fees (in which case registration fees would be several hundred dollars or Euros more than for IWSP4) rather than from sponsors.
answered question56
skipped question
13
Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes57.1%32
No42.9%24
viewPlease let us know your thoughts on this.21
45. Other than AES, NIH, and industry partners, are you aware of any agencies, companies or institutions that may be interested in funding the next workshop?
answered question20
skipped question
49
Response
Count
view 20
46. Other comments/suggestions -
answered question20
skipped question
49
Response
Count
view 20

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /