37
$\begingroup$

The Americans and the French use a different notation for open intervals: The Americans use (x, y) while the French use ]x, y[. How did this notational divergence appear?

Ali Caglayan
1,6161 gold badge15 silver badges23 bronze badges
asked Oct 30, 2014 at 15:44
$\endgroup$
8
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ The square brackets notation is due to Bourbaki. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 30, 2014 at 16:56
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Some discussion on this topic here and here. One commenter suggest that the backward brackets might have been introduced by Bourbaki to prevent confusion with ordered pairs. I am still at a loss for a documented history, but it is at least a part of an old ISO standard. I am not seeing it in the latest standard ISO 80000-2. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 30, 2014 at 18:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I guess it is intuitive (inclusion/exclusion of the endpoints depends on the direction of the bracket), but I have not found anything written by them stating this or some other motivation explicitly. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 30, 2014 at 18:18
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @J.W.Perry Thanks! I had indeed went through the standard for that reason, see notation 2-6.10 last column. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 30, 2014 at 23:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The ] [ notation is used in Belgium too, also in the Dutch-speaking part. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 27, 2023 at 13:27

1 Answer 1

27
$\begingroup$

Notation $()$ is traditional, and $].[$ was introduced by Bourbaki.

Much of the Bourbaki notations and terminology became standard, but English speaking people are the most conservative ones in this respect:-) (Recall the history of the metric system:-)

Another example of the same is "injection", "surjection", "bijection". Many English authors still write "one-to-one", "onto" and "one-to-one and onto".

Another example: Bourbaki taught us that "positive" is $\geq 0,ドル and "strictly positive" is $>0$.

But many people still prefer "positive" to mean $>0$ and "non-negative" for $\geq0$.

Remark. I am educated in Ukraine in 1970-s, and I experienced a strong influence of Bourbaki on education. But I still like $(,),ドル perhaps just for aesthetic reasons.

answered Nov 1, 2014 at 20:08
$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

Draft saved
Draft discarded

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google
Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.