Are these sentence correct:
(The phrases after the comma are supposed to be after-thoughts. That's why there are commas.)
1-I read his new book, about Darwin's theory of natural selection.
(Meaning: I read his new book, which is about Darwin's theory of natural selection.)
[I think here the comma is necessary. If it is taken out, the sentence will imply that he has written at least one other book about natural selection. With the comma there is no such implication. We don't know if he has written any other book about natural selection.]
2-I bought a new pitcher, with a very strange handle.
(Meaning: I bought a new pitcher, which has a very strange handle.)
3-He has made a few feature films and a documentary, about Gypsy music.
(Meaning: He has made a few feature films and a documentary, which is about Gypsy music.)
I am trying to figure out in what cases one can take out 'which is' or 'which has'. I actually don't think that these sentences work and would always put in 'which is' or 'which' has in writing. I am not sure that they are wrong though and I think they might be used in spoken English. In 2 and 3 we would have correct sentences if we drop the comma. That I know. I wanted to see if they'd work with a comma, ie. if the 'clause' is non-restrictive.
(The phrases after the comma are supposed to be after-thoughts. That's why there are commas.)
1-I read his new book, about Darwin's theory of natural selection.
(Meaning: I read his new book, which is about Darwin's theory of natural selection.)
[I think here the comma is necessary. If it is taken out, the sentence will imply that he has written at least one other book about natural selection. With the comma there is no such implication. We don't know if he has written any other book about natural selection.]
2-I bought a new pitcher, with a very strange handle.
(Meaning: I bought a new pitcher, which has a very strange handle.)
3-He has made a few feature films and a documentary, about Gypsy music.
(Meaning: He has made a few feature films and a documentary, which is about Gypsy music.)
I am trying to figure out in what cases one can take out 'which is' or 'which has'. I actually don't think that these sentences work and would always put in 'which is' or 'which' has in writing. I am not sure that they are wrong though and I think they might be used in spoken English. In 2 and 3 we would have correct sentences if we drop the comma. That I know. I wanted to see if they'd work with a comma, ie. if the 'clause' is non-restrictive.